SBUX vs AMZN
Starbucks Corporation vs Amazon.com, Inc. · Consumer Cyclical · scored 2026-08-04
Head-to-head
The numbers that matter, side by side. A star marks the stronger stock on each merit measure.
| Measure | SBUX | AMZN | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gem Score | 50/100 ★ | 48/100 | |
| Strategies agreeing | 3 | 5 | |
| Price | $103.37 | $266.43 | |
| Market cap | $118B | $2.9T | |
| Market regime | Bullish | Choppy Bull | |
| Best-fit thesis | CAN SLIM | Operating Leverage |
Modeled from the GemStox stochastic + volatility models (order: SBUX · AMZN). Not financial advice.
Strategy-thesis head-to-head
GemStox scores each stock across 14 independent investment theses. Here is where they differ.
| Strategy thesis | SBUX | AMZN | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| GARP | ★ | -5 | |
| Mean Reversion | ★ | -2 | |
| Quality Compounder | ★ | -9 | |
| CAN SLIM | ★ | +4 | |
| Low-Vol Defensive | ★ | -6 | |
| Catalyst / Event | ★ | -5 | |
| Dividend Growth | ★ | +2 | |
| S-Curve Growth | ★ | -9 | |
| Piotroski F-Score | ★ | -11 | |
| Operating Leverage | ★ | -75 | |
| Net Payout Yield | ★ | +20 |
SBUX leads 3, AMZN leads 8 — of 11 comparable theses
Dimension by dimension
Average sub-signal score across valuation, quality, risk, growth, and momentum.
| Dimension | SBUX | AMZN |
|---|---|---|
| Valuation | ★ | |
| Quality | ★ | |
| Risk | ★ | |
| Growth | ★ | |
| Momentum & Technicals | ★ |
How this comparison is computed
Every figure is computed from the same cached market + fundamentals data GemStox uses to score individual stocks — no two theses double-count. Try the free Stock Score calculator, read the full scoring methodology, or open either single-stock analysis above for the full 14-signal breakdown.
Free: compare any stocks in the live app →
Open the GemStox Compare tool and put any two (or up to ten) tickers head-to-head — live win probability, optimal position size, and pre-calculated stop/target levels. It's free to try: 3 comparisons a day, no account, then upgrade from $3 for unlimited.
Compare free in the app →Educational comparison generated from cached market + fundamentals data as of 2026-08-04. Not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.