AAPL vs MSFT
Apple Inc. vs Microsoft Corporation · Technology · scored 2026-08-03
Head-to-head
The numbers that matter, side by side. A star marks the stronger stock on each merit measure.
| Measure | AAPL | MSFT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gem Score | 53/100 ★ | 45/100 | |
| Strategies agreeing | 5 | 6 | |
| Price | $303.42 | $487.65 | |
| Market cap | $4.5T | $3.6T | |
| Market regime | Bullish | Neutral | |
| Best-fit thesis | CAN SLIM | Quality Compounder |
Modeled from the GemStox stochastic + volatility models (order: AAPL · MSFT). Not financial advice.
Strategy-thesis head-to-head
GemStox scores each stock across 14 independent investment theses. Here is where they differ.
| Strategy thesis | AAPL | MSFT | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deep Value | ★ | +6 | |
| GARP | ★ | -8 | |
| Mean Reversion | ★ | +9 | |
| Quality Compounder | ★ | +19 | |
| CAN SLIM | ★ | +1 | |
| Low-Vol Defensive | ★ | +16 | |
| Catalyst / Event | ★ | -9 | |
| Dividend Growth | ★ | +14 | |
| S-Curve Growth | ★ | -29 | |
| Piotroski F-Score | +0 | ||
| Operating Leverage | ★ | -1 | |
| Net Payout Yield | +0 |
AAPL leads 6, MSFT leads 4, 2 tied — of 12 comparable theses
Dimension by dimension
Average sub-signal score across valuation, quality, risk, growth, and momentum.
| Dimension | AAPL | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Valuation | ★ | |
| Quality | ★ | |
| Risk | ★ | |
| Growth | ★ | |
| Momentum & Technicals | ★ |
How this comparison is computed
Every figure is computed from the same cached market + fundamentals data GemStox uses to score individual stocks — no two theses double-count. Try the free Stock Score calculator, read the full scoring methodology, or open either single-stock analysis above for the full 14-signal breakdown.
Want the full live comparison, not just the consensus?
The GemStox app's interactive Compare runs the live signal stack on any two tickers — probability scores, optimal position size, and pre-calculated stop/target levels. The public page above is the free, always-crawlable summary.
Unlock with the $3 Day Pass →Educational comparison generated from cached market + fundamentals data as of 2026-08-03. Not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.